Al U SUCK

Albert Gore U R a genuine ******* U and Ur party represent the anti~thesis of True Liberalism, a critical philosophy that rejects both extremes of the Left and the Right. What U and the Most reprehensible members of Ur party such as Chuckie S, Janet R, and Ed R represent is UnAmerican Socialism, taking people's ability 2 determine 4 themselves how 2 live their lives in the best possible manner. Ur Attitude Of **** Everyone Else, I'm only in it for myself has resulted in the biggest stock market crash since 1929, which the spineless media has played down in their own lustful campaign to retain power. Give u a hint Al, the stock market ain't worried that shrub will get in the white house, it's worried that Ur non~stock~owning manipulating ass Will, via unconstitutional means A special plea to those Americans of jewish descent that still insist on supporting socialism: continue 2 due so at Ur own peril. Ignorance of Ur History and a loss in faith of ur True Creator will only lead 2 one inevitable conclusion, Ur own genocide. Yahweh never said thou shalt not kill, she said Thou Shalt Not Murder. Support of civilian disarmament is defacto support of MURDER. Don't be cocky and think just because U supposedly control media and important political positions it's not going 2 happen: It's that exact Arrogance that will Allow it 2 Happen. Wake Up People 4 GoD will smite down the Asleep; U can bet Ur Ass on It [Edited by for20 on 11-29-2000 at 08:27 PM] __________________ What in the... renots, you're starting to spell like the Squirrel...and you're coming off almost as bigoted as the 'milk. Jewish folks running the media? Whoo-boy, cut down on the sticky green... __________________ Hey, I've got enough relatives 2 gnow Yes, I'll say it again many Jews have given Intellect precedence over their Heart. I point the finger at power~hungry freedom~hating politicians like DiFi for encouraging antisemitism among the general population, a prejudice that even I have had the displeasure of experiencing. So There :0p __________________ Wow, Major Brain Damage!! __________________ 2 realatives = the general Jewish population. Riiiight. I suppose that my entire family must be the exception? Oh, wait there are more than 2, so I can say that the general Jewish population acts the same. renots/for20, you've gone from posting interesting stuff that the whole board would read to an extremist that posts consistently offensive materials. Blu __________________ Quote: Originally posted by pennypinch bigoted as the 'milk. you wouldnt happen to be talkin about GOTMILK now would you. __________________ Quote: Originally posted by gotmilk Quote: Originally posted by pennypinch bigoted as the 'milk. you wouldnt happen to be talkin about GOTMILK now would you. Yeah, milk's not a bigot, he's a nimrod __________________ Picking over presidential "undervotes" and trying to divine voters' intentions just ain't right! Or at least that's the argument Republicans and Bush family surrogates have been making for the last several weeks in Florida. Doing so can lead to endless recounts, changing the rules after the votes are cast, "mischief," and a number of other bad things. But apparently this is a rule that only applies east of the Mississippi. In New Mexico on Tuesday, Republican party officials prevailed upon the state canvassing board to have a judge, of all people (state District Judge David W. Bonem), consider whether undervotes in Roosevelt County should be re-examined and possibly included in the county's tally. Gore currently leads Bush by 483 votes in New Mexico, and there are 570 undervotes in Roosevelt County, which voted for Bush 2-1. Mickey Barnett, a Republican national committeeman for New Mexico, said he found it "highly unusual" that 10 percent of the voters in the southeastern New Mexico county chose not to vote for president. That's of course the same argument Republicans ridicule when it's made in Florida by the Gore forces. __________________ No, the percentage of "undervotes" in Florida is more along the lines of 2.5%, well within a point or two of the historically expected numbers, if you look at non-vote averages around the country over time. 10%, now that's statistically abnormal. I'm not saying impossible, but its far more out of the ordinary than the ballots in FL. Don't be fooled! Anybody can lie using statistics and sound like they're speaking truth. __________________ In Miami-Dade County there were approximately 10,000 "undervotes," meaning votes on which the tabulating machine detected no choice for president. That's 1.6 percent of the total. But undervotes are just one type of "nonvotes." The other type is "overvotes," where a voter punched out two or more holes. There are about 18,000 of these, which when you add it to the 10,000 means that 4.4 percent of the votes cast in Miami were "nonvotes," not 1.6 percent. The undervote in Miami-Dade amounts to 1.6% of the entire 600,000 votes in that county. The "10%" in Roosevelt County amount to 570 votes, thus implying the entire county contains a whopping 5,700 votes! With a sample set one one-hundredth the size, the standard deviation is much larger. Additionally, when you speak of the Florida under-vote, you exclude over-votes which were not counted either. This brings the total up to 5% both of these statements are quoted from slate to read the full article on bush's undervote hypocrisy go here: http://slate.msn.com/code/ThisJustIn...idMessage=6587 __________________ ...so nice to have a alternate persona to lapse into and rant For20's point, minus the vitriol, was that calling for disarming otherwise lawful citizens without due process in the face of a potentially tyranical government[and don't try to tell me FEMA couldn't be Abused toward that end!] is tantamount to a declaration of civil war. think twice before U blurt out what U think U believe :0) __________________ so fakefigures, everyone is expected to behave according to statistics at all times and if they don't fall into the predicted figures[like duh 85/15 means that even 15% time it will happen which is still POSSIBLE if not likely; like a whole other bunch of stuff in Life where the odds seem impossible BUT YET IT HAPPENS] Turn OFF Ur LieVision already; it not making U any more informed :0) __________________ The undervote in Miami-Dade amounts to 1.6% of the entire 600,000 votes in that county. The "10%" in Roosevelt County amount to 570 votes, thus implying the entire county contains a whopping 5,700 votes! With a sample set one one-hundredth the size, the standard deviation is much larger. Actually, at around 5000, the sample basically approaches random, statistically speaking. The sampling error between 5000 samples and 5,000,000 is basically negligible, even when we're talking about differences of 500. __________________ ROFL!!!! http://www.gopfun.com/moredubya.html __________________ Penny, Thats only true with two or three outcomes (presidential polling data). A long ballot has thousands of possible outcomes and therefore a statistically sound sample that accounts for for everything (stolen ballots, ruined ballots, 'acts of dog', undervotes, overvotes) would need to be much larger than 5k. Saying that a sample that small would correctly predict highly unlikely outcomes accurately, would be like an average pre-election poll accurately predicting Howard Phillips' (of the U.S. Constitution party, makes George W. Bush and his cronies look like Al Sharpton) final vote total. Sheesh! I thought you were a math guy. __________________ Quote: Originally posted by fakesurfers Sheesh! I thought you were a math guy. Holy crap, you couldn't be more wrong!! __________________ Quote: Originally posted by fakesurfers Penny, Thats only true with two or three outcomes (presidential polling data). A long ballot has thousands of possible outcomes and therefore a statistically sound sample that accounts for for everything (stolen ballots, ruined ballots, 'acts of dog', undervotes, overvotes) would need to be much larger than 5k. Saying that a sample that small would correctly predict highly unlikely outcomes accurately, would be like an average pre-election poll accurately predicting Howard Phillips' (of the U.S. Constitution party, makes George W. Bush and his cronies look like Al Sharpton) final vote total. Sheesh! I thought you were a math guy. I think you're using some "fuzzy math" here . In fact, as far as this sample is concerned there are only two outcomes. Either a vote for president or no vote for president. The issue in New Mexico was not missing ballots, dog-eaten ballots, or what have you. It was simply a statistically abnormal number of ballots that did not register a vote for president when read by the machine. The rest of the ballot is not being analyzed for the purposes of this measurement, and is independent from the line listing the presidential vote (despite what some desperate Democrats would have us believe). For all intensive purposes this is a presidential poll, so pennypinch's (and my) argument stands. __________________ http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?...541&p=34513449 Mavi forum